MINUTES ARE NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVAL AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING.

 

 

TOWN OF SOMERS

CONSERVATION COMMISSION

P. O. Box 308

Somers, Connecticut 06071

 

CONSERVATION MINUTES

11/6/02; 7:00 p.m.

Town Hall

 

I.          PUBLIC HEARING

            a.         Wetlands Application #460, Filling Wetlands for New House and Septic System, Lot #4, Old Farm Road, Mansour

 

            Chairman Simon Lipton opened the public hearing at 7:00 p.m.

 

            The Town Planner noted that this public hearing must be continued because signs for the public hearing were not posted on the property (10) days before the hearing date, as required.

 

Lise Wood made a motion to continue this public hearing until the next Conservation meeting on 12/4/02 at 7:00 p.m.  This motion was seconded by George Grant and unanimously approved by the Commission.

 

II.        CALL TO ORDER:

 

            Chairman Simon Lipton called the regular meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.  Members present were:  Simon Lipton; Don Smith; George Grant; Lise Wood and Joan Formeister.  Also present was Town Planner, Patrice Carson.

 

III.       AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION:       There was none.

 

IV.       OLD BUSINESS:

            a.         Discussion/Possible Decision:  Wetlands Application #461, Install Dry Hydrant in Pond, Billings Road (Cedar Knob), Town of Somers

 

            Don Smith made a motion to approve Wetlands Application #461 - based on the positive statements made by Wetlands Agent David Askew - with the stipulation that this work be done during dry weather and low flow conditions.  This motion was seconded by Lise Wood and unanimously approved by the Commission.

 

            b.         Discussion/Possible Decision:  Wetlands Application #462, New House in Upland Review Area, 10 Manse Hill Road, McCullough

 

            David Askew suggested in his memo to the Commission dated 11/6/02 that the Commission review the ability of this lot to support the usual appurtenant structures such as pools, sheds, and gazebos - and whether or not such future uses would require additional wetland alterations.

 

Patrice Carson said the Staff usually discusses with the homeowner the possible restriction of additional accessory buildings or pools on a lot that is marginal because of wetlands.  It appears that any additional structures on this lot would require a wetland permit.

 

Mike Mocko, Environmental Consultant for the applicant, presented the drawing to the Commission for their review.  He pointed out a line on the drawing depicting that no work will be done beyond this line because of wetlands - except for the removal of brush and non-native plants that will be hand pruned.

 

Mike Mocko said it is common to attach special conditions to the approval of a lot such as this; i.e., a restriction on any additional buildings or pools without the consent of the Conservation Commission to insure that the wetlands will not be disturbed.

 

Mike Mocko also suggested that a conservation easement could be placed on the deed so that a prospective buyer would know that additional development of the property could be a problem.  He said the proposed house is small compared to others on Manse Hill Drive.  It is a four-bedroom Colonial with about 2,000 square feet of living space.

 

Joan Formeister remarked that a smaller house would have less impact on the wetland area.

 

Mike Mocko said that right now, the house is set back 30' from the wetland area.  The buffer area could be increased by moving the silt fence closer to the wetland.  This is an isolated wetland that is only connected by an underground pipe and the storm drain system.

 

Don Smith thinks that the owner of this property would be inclined to fill in this wetland area in order to give himself more useable space.

 

Mike Mocko feels the buffer zone is adequate.  No one can assure that a future property owner will not fill this wetland.  A conservation easement could be identified to the property owner; i.e., placing signs on trees abutting the wetland.

 

Patrice Carson said it appears there are several options:  the Commission could require that a conservation easement be placed on the deed and identified on the property.  Also, the applicant could show what a smaller house would look like on the lot and see if this would make any difference in protecting the wetland area.

 

Patrice Carson asked about something she could not identify on the drawing.  Mike Mocko told her that it was part of the living area of the house but it was constructed on a slab.  Patrice told him that slab construction cannot be used as part of a new house - only for a garage.

 

Mike Mocko said the slab was proposed because the foundation drains in this area of the house would not meet the required setbacks for the septic system.  Mike said that instead of the traditional foundation drains, waterproof coatings could be used to be sure the foundation did not leak.  He said this is more expensive but could be done.

 

Don Smith suggested that Mike Mocko go back to the builder and ask him to revise his plan to a smaller three-bedroom house with a full basement.

 

Mike Mocko feels that cutting 10' off the house will not lessen the wetland impact.

 

Further discussion on this agenda item will be postponed until the next Conservation meeting on 12/4/02.  The Staff will review this application further and Mike Mocko will prepare a plan revision - with the approval of the developer.

 

V.         NEW BUSINESS:

            a.         Wetlands Application #463, New House in Upland Review Area, 102 Scully Road, Panciera

 

            Mike Mocko, Environmental Consultant, for the applicant presented a plan to the Commission for their review.  He said there is presently a small house on the lot - which will be removed.  This application is for the construction of a new house - replacing the existing home on the lot.  In order for the new house to comply with current Zoning Regulations, the septic system is in the front of the house.  A new well will also be drilled and the old well will be abandoned.  The property has an intermittent stream.  There are no inland wetlands associated with the stream.  The stream does fill up during significant rainfall and flows down the mountain.  There is a 30' culvert to handle the water runoff during significant storm events.  The entire lot is lawn - with the exception of the rear of the property where there are large trees.

 

There is a "limit of work" line.  There is an existing driveway that will be extended to the new garage.  It appears that a sump pump will have to be used in the basement to discharge the water from the foundation drains.  A house plan is available.

 

David Askew, Wetlands Agent, has not seen these plans.  He may have some conditions of approval after his review.

 

            b.         Wetlands Application #464, Permitted Use As of Right for Logging, Billings Road, Lucia Property, McEwen

 

            Steve McEwen, logger for Mr. Lucia, presented the logging plan to the Commission.  The wetlands have all been flagged.  All of the logging will be done west of the brook.  There is a right-of-way into the Lucia property through the Antonacci property - basically on the driveway.  There is a gravel road that veers off the driveway onto the Lucia property.  There is a viable stream - a good trout stream - called Abbey Brook on the property.  Dave Askew has asked for a 50' buffer to the stream.  The land is flat up to the brook.  This is a large timber harvest with no more than 50% cutting in any area.

 

Steve McEwen said he would not take his skidder into the wetlands.  There will be no more than 50% cutting in the wetland area.  On the other side of the stream, there is a huge wetland - which looks to be impossible to log.

 

Access to the area must be from the east, across a relatively dry portion of the oxbow and it should be marked in the field prior to starting the operation.

 

Joan Formeister made a motion to approve this application as a permitted use of right with the stipulation that a 50' buffer is maintained to the brook and access to the property must be marked prior to beginning this logging operation.  This motion was seconded by George Grant and unanimously approved by the Commission.

 

            c.         Modification of Wetland Permit #447, Additional Wetland Filling, 164 Hampden Road, Grower Direct

 

            Lise Wood recused herself from discussion of this item only.

 

            Michael Mocko, Environmental Consultant for the applicant, stated that no work has been done without permits.  The pond and wetland work that is part of the agreed mitigation is nearly completed.  The outlet structure for the pond was done first so that muddy water would not go into the wetlands.  As planned, the water will flow to the pond into a shallow marsh area.  The existing vegetation has been carefully removed and placed into the shallow pond area.  The pond has been enlarged and the wetlands enlarged as well.  There will be an additional 2,000 square feet of wetlands.

 

Mr. VanWingerden would like to fill in more wetland area.  He needs a truck pullout and turn-around.  He would like to put in 40' of pipe.  There would be a 30' encroachment into the wetland.  5,696 square feet of wetland will be filled and it is proposed that this 5,696 square feet be added onto the debit that is owed for replacement of wetlands.

 

Once this work is finished, the applicant will propose another pond, marsh wetlands - wet meadow replicate.  An as-built plan for the project will be available soon which will show a new balance for the next phase of wetland replication.  Mr. VanWingerden has submitted a letter requesting that this change be part of the original permit.  It is planned to submit this as-built plan to the Commission as well as a plan for the balance of the mitigation.

 

Don Smith said the applicant has a month to prepare a mitigation plan and he would like to have it submitted at the next Conservation meeting.

 

Mike Mocko agreed to work up a mitigation plan for the next meeting.  He said he feels the Commission will be pleased with the finished product at Grower Direct and he invited the Commissioners to take a look at the project.

 

Lise Wood returned to her Commission seat.

 

            d.         Other:

Whittaker Property

 

Don Smith stated that Carl Whittaker has volunteered to go back to his siblings to see if they would consider selling the 281 acres of his father's estate.  The Town and the Land Trust are offering to come to some sort of agreement to buy the land.  Two appraisals will be required and the State will pay 50% of the cost.  A signed agreement will be required from the Whittaker's stating that the lower of the two appraisals would be accepted.  The Town and the Land Trust would own the property.  This property abuts McCann's property to Wells Road to Mountain View Road.

 

Ideally, the federal government will pay 50% of the cost of the land and State money could be used for the Town's portion of the remaining 50%.

 

Carl Whittaker said the family would like to log the property; Don Smith advised against it.

 

George Grant suggested that if the siblings don't agree to sell the land, try to get a letter of first refusal from the owners.  Then the family can try to sell the property on the open market.

 

Don Smith said the Land Trust will try to get the best terms possible for the Town.  There is some farmland on this property.  The Conservation Commission could request that the Board of Selectmen authorize one million dollars for the purchase of this property.

 

VI.       STAFF/COMMISSION REPORT:   There was none.

 

VII.      CORRESPONDENCE AND BILLS:

 

            There were three bills from the Journal Inquirer:

 

            9//4/02                          $86.57

            10/7/02                         $47.22

            11/6/02                         $125.92

 

            The 11/6/02 public hearing will have to be re-advertised because the hearing was continued until the next Conservation meeting.

 

George Grant made a motion to approve payment of the bills; seconded by Joan Formeister and unanimously approved by the Commission.

 

VIII.    MINUTES APPROVAL:       October 2, 2002

 

            Joan Formeister made a motion to approve the minutes of 10/2/02; seconded by Lise Wood and unanimously approved by the Commission.

 

IX.       ADJOURNMENT:

 

            Motion to adjourn made by Joan Formeister; seconded by Lise Wood and unanimously approved by the Commission.  The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m.

 

                                                            Respectfully submitted,

 

 

                                                            Joan Formeister, Secretary

 

                                                            Connie Carenzo, Recording Secretary

 

 

MINUTES ARE NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVAL AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING.