TOWN OF SOMERS

PLANNING COMMISSION

P.O. BOX 308

SOMERS, CONNECTICUT 06071

 

PLANNING MINUTES

REGULAR MEETING

Thursday, February 23, 2006

7:00 p.m.

 

I.            PUBLIC HEARING

 

a.            Continuation of Subdivision Application #390:  6-Lots LaCabana Road (off Mountain View Road), Jalbert

 

Vice Chairman Cliff Bordeaux called the public hearing to order at 7:05 p.m.

 

Sandy Aeschliman presented revised plans for the applicant and was accompanied by David Jalbert and Ron Jalbert.  Mr. Aeschliman noted that he had received and reviewed staff comments and given these revised plans to staff last week.  He is aware of two outstanding issues – the dry hydrant and the abandoned culvert pipe running beneath Mountain View Road.

 

Mr. Strauss noted that he has not received word from Public Works regarding the pipe, but generally the removal of such items are required in order to avoid having to deal with them later on.  Mr. Aeschliman noted that the applicant was prepared to work with the Town, whichever decision was made.

 

With respect to the dry hydrant, Mr. Strauss noted that a letter had been received by the Town from Frank Falcone, Fire Deputy Chief, stating that the Fire Chief wants a dry hydrant in place.  He noted that it is a safety issue arising from the applicant’s proposed development.  While Mr. Strauss believed that while an insurance benefit would be realized by installing the dry hydrant, and emergency response time would decrease, he was also unsure of who was legally responsible to pay for the installation.

 

He explained that Patrice Carson had told him that if the pond owner is willing to have the dry hydrant installed, it is something that the Town should have.

 

It was noted that there is no specific regulation requiring a dry hydrant for a subdivision and more information is necessary from staff prior to making a decision on this matter.

 

David Jalbert requested an explanation of what would be involved in a dry hydrant installation and the basic concept of the procedure was explained to him.  He asked for an estimated cost and was told it would be somewhere around $5,000 to $6,000.

 

Mr. Bordeaux noted that now that this item has been brought up at the public hearing, it can be researched and discussed further once the hearing is closed.  He asked for comments either for or against the project from the audience and none were received.

 

A motion was made by Brad Pellissier, seconded by Mike Collins and unanimously voted to close the public hearing at 7:25 p.m.

 

II.        CALL TO ORDER

 

Vice Chairman Cliff Bordeaux called the regular meeting to order at 7:27 p.m.  Members Cliff Bordeaux, Michael Collins, Brad Pellissier, and Alternates Greg Genlot, (seated for Karl Walton) and Georgeanne Kuzman, (seated for Michelle Hayward) were present and constituted a quorum.  Town Engineer Merv Strauss was also present.

 

Cliff Bordeaux recused himself at this time and Brad Pellissier stepped up as Chairman.

 

III.       OLD BUSINESS

 

a.         Zoning Referral:  Modification of Special Use Permit Application for Gravel Bank, South Road, Bordeaux Farm

 

Applicant Cliff Bordeaux presented plans for his gravel bank, explaining that he is seeking to add a Phase 11 which would be comprised of a wooded section that remains between two completed Phases.  Granting the permit would enable him to finish off the area more uniformly.

 

Mr. Strauss noted that the application is very logical and makes good sense.  He is agreeable to the proposed project and noted that no additional bond would be needed.

 

A motion was made by Greg Pellissier, seconded by Georgeanne Kuzman and unanimously voted to recommend to the Zoning Commission approval of Bordeaux’s application for modification of his gravel bank permit.

 

b.         Zoning Referral:  Site Plan Application for Outdoor Growing Areas and Gravel Bank, 164 Hampden Road, Grower Direct Farms

 

Mr. VanWingerden presented plans and explained that about 1-1/2 years ago Grower Direct Farms began leveling out some of the areas at 164 Hampden Road.  This involved removing some of the excess materials.  He was notified by the Zoning Enforcement Officer that due to the scope of the project, he was required to apply for a permit to run a gravel operation.  Currently they are approximately half way through the project.

 

Merv Strauss visited the area with Len VanWingerden and Mike Mocko a few days ago and showed photos he had taken of the area, relating them to the plans and concurring that the project was in advanced stages.

 

He commented that there should be some protection in place at the area where the access road will be removed to prevent damage to vehicles moving through the area.  He also noted that the road is on two different parcels of land and Mr. VanWingerden explained that this summer he and the abutting neighbor are planning to resurvey the area and exchange small sections of property so as to be certain the access road will be entirely on his property.

 

Mr. Strauss added that he is requesting that details of the erosion control plan be placed on the maps and he needs to have details of the check dams and whether or not hay bales will be used.  All of the Conservation Commission’s requirements need to be shown as well.  Mr. VanWingerden stated that he has asked Mike Mocko to do this and once complete, the revised plan will be given to staff.

 

A motion was made by Greg Genlot, seconded by Georgeanne Kuzman and unanimously voted to not make a recommendation until final plans are received and reviewed by the Town Engineer.

 

At this time, Cliff Bordeaux returned to the meeting and resumed his position as acting Chairman.

 

c.         Other - No other Old Business was presented.

 

IV.       NEW BUSINESS

 

a.            Resubdivision Application #391:  2-Lots, 92 Field Road, Percoski

 

Richard Percoski presented a survey done 2 years ago by BSC Group in Glastonbury, who had originally surveyed the parcel in the 1950’s under the name of Megson and Hyppa.  Mr. Percoski and his sister, Theresa O’Connor, inherited the approximately 6- acre parcel from their mother’s estate and are now seeking to divide the parcel, with a 175 foot frontage on one lot and a 183 foot frontage on the other lot, thus enabling the empty lot to be designated as a potential building lot.  The wetlands have been flagged and there are no disturbances to be made to them.

 

Merv Strauss explained that he has sent a list of items needing to go on the plans to Ken Smith at BSC Group.  It was noted that a public well may currently exist within 2,000 feet of the property, and Mr. Strauss requested that this be shown on the plans.

 

Mr. Strauss also noted that the Commission will probably want to consider the open space issue.  He expects that the Open Space Committee will opt for a fee, so an appraiser will need to be contacted.  Mr. Percoski was advised to speak to Mrs. Carson about this.

 

Because this application is a re-subdivision, a public hearing is required.

 

Discussion followed about the proposed driveway shown on the map.  Mr. Percoski explained that there is no formal driveway, but this area was used many years ago by the farm equipment passing by the home toward the back of the property.  Mr. Strauss explained the requirements concerning formal driveways and noted that if a formal driveway was not going to be created, it should be removed from the plans.

 

He also explained that the proposed building lot needs to be more fully described as meeting the qualifications of a building lot.  Proposed grading should be included behind a designated building location.

 

Discussion followed about the topography lines shown on the current survey and Mr. Percoski explained them in greater detail.  Mr. Strauss realized that Comment No. 11 on his letter would no longer apply and need to be revised.

 

A brief discussion followed about the iron pins shown on the plans as well.  Mr. Strauss requested the use of monuments rather than pins so a more permanent marker would exist.  He also explained the importance of installing the monuments in a timely manner so as to avoid the need for a bond.

 

b.         Other - No Other New Business was presented.

 

V.            DISCUSSION:  PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT

 

A reminder was given that the next meeting is scheduled for March 27, 2006.

 

VI.            STAFF/COMMISSIONER REPORTS - No reports were given.

 

VII.            AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION - There was none.

 

VIII.            CORRESPONDENCE AND BILLS - None presented.

 

IX.            MINUTES APPROVAL

 

A correction was made to the February 9, 2006 minutes on Page 3:  Change “Prad Pellessier” to “Brad Pellissier”.

 

A motion was made by Mike Collins, seconded by Brad Pellissier and unanimously voted to approve the minutes of the February 9, 2006 meeting as amended.

 

X.            ADJOURNMENT

 

A motion was made by Georgeanne Kuzman, seconded by Brad Pellissier and unanimously voted to adjourn the February 23, 2006 Planning Commission meeting at 8:20 p.m.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

 

 

Brad Pellissier, Secretary                                  Robin Timmons, Recording Secretary

 

MINUTES ARE NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVAL AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING.