TOWN OF SOMERS

CONSERVATION COMMISSION

P.O. Box 308

Somers, Connecticut 06071

 

CONSERVATION MINUTES

July 7, 2004 – 7:00 p.m.

Town Hall

 

 

 

I.  PUBLIC HEARING:

 

Chairman Joan Formeister called the public hearing to order at 7:00 p.m.  Wetlands Agent David Askew read the legal notice dated June 22, 2004.

 

a.  Conservation Commission’s Proposed Amendments to the Entirety of the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Regulations

 

David Askew presented copies of the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Regulations as amended to Commission members, pointing out the various changes, many of which were related to procedure and statutory changes.

 

He stated that he had received correspondence from Town Attorney Carl Landolina and from the Department of Environmental Protection in response to the proposed changes in the regulations.  The Town Attorney had recommended three changes, one being the correction of a typo; the second, that the definition of “farming” be the same as is used in the Zoning Regulations; and the third, a change in the wording regarding the Commission’s requirement of “more or less information” from applicants.  Attorney Landolina suggested the removal of the word “less” from that statement. The DEP letter simply stated that they are no longer reviewing municipal regulations.

 

Mr. Askew then went over the various proposed changes in detail, explaining the reason for each.  These changes included those that the Town Attorney had proposed.   However, the definition of “farming” remains as is because the language reflects the wording in the state statute and the term “agriculture” is defined in the zoning regulations, not “farming”.  In addition, he recommended adding a definition of clearing limits proposed by applicants, since the Commission had never had the opportunity to see what an applicant intended to clear in the past.  Also included was a definition of  ‘conservation easement’, for clarification purposes.

 

A statutory change signed into effect June 4, 2004, was also included regarding the Commission’s ability to deny an application based on habitat.

 

Also included was a change regarding the fee structure.

 

Mr. Askew presented the opportunity for Commission members to ask questions and Don Smith asked if it was necessary to have a public hearing with each change on the town map.  David Askew replied that no, this was not the case in Somers, as it is impossible to re-do the map with each change to the wetlands.  The plans presented by the individual applicants served the Commission’s needs adequately.

 

There being no comments from the public, a motion was made by Lise Wood, seconded by Don Smith and unanimously approved to close the public hearing at 7:17 p.m.

 

II.  CALL TO ORDER:

 

Chairman Joan Formeister called the meeting to order at 7:18 p.m.  Members present were:  Joan Formeister, Dan Fraro, Donald Smith, Todd Whitford, Lise Wood, Sarah Moynihan (who joined the table at 7:25), seated for Karl Walton.  Also present:  David Askew, Wetlands Agent.

 

III.  OLD BUSINESS:

 

a.  Discussion/Possible Decision:  Conservation Commission’s Proposed Amendments to the Entirety of the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Regulations

 

A motion was made by Don Smith, seconded by Lise Wood and unanimously approved  to accept the proposed amendments to the entirety of the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Regulations.

 

b.  Discussion/Decision:  Wetlands Application #498, 5-Lot Subdivision, Bridle Path, Richard A. McCullough, Inc. Builders

 

Mike Mocko, Environmental Consultant for the applicant, presented his final revisions based on changes made according to the recommendations of Steve Jacobs, Merv Strauss and David Askew.  He explained that Mr. Strauss had recommended the elimination of the detention pond.  Instead, he proposed construction of a swale that will drain into the wetlands.  Silt fences will be installed to protect construction and drainage.  The swale will be lined with sod reinforcement which will last until the seeding is firmly established and permanent.

 

Mr. Smith asked for a review of the lot sizes, which Mr. Mocko gave as varying from a low of about 2.2 acres to a high of approximately 58 acres.

 

Todd Whitford asked who will actually own the improvements and be in charge of maintaining them.  Mr. Mocko said that the Town will have easements which will enable them to maintain the improvements.  He added that the sumps and catch basins will not have much sediment once the construction is finished.

 

Don Smith asked if the road sand will add much sediment and Mr. Mocko said that would not be a problem if the roads and catch basins are adequately cleaned by the Town.

 

Mr. Smith also asked if there would be a stream on the 58 acre lot.  Mr. Mocko stated that there would not be.  The stream begins outside of the lot acreage.

 

Mr. Smith also inquired as to the condition of the wells.  He wondered if there might be a pollution problem.  Mr. Mocko said that none of the wells in the nearby areas are polluted and there is no history of well contamination in the area.  The sites are up-stream from the known contamination.

 

David Askew said that the applicant had done a good job with the passive storm water planning and his only suggestion was to have the engineer or environmental consultant supervise construction of the storm drainage system.  He doesn’t expect the wetland to dry out because of the nature of soils on the site.  He also suggested that in areas where wetlands were near homes, that the wetlands be permanently marked for identification purposes.  He confirmed to Mr. Mocko that wetland tags on the trees are permitted.

 

Dan Fraro asked if the 6 inch pipes were good for drain pipes and David Askew said they were.  Mr. Mocko added that if an emergency arises and they clog, there is a spillway

which will handle the flow.  There is no potential for flooding on the properties.

 

A motion was made by Lise Wood and seconded by Don Smith to approve Wetlands Application #498, 5-lot subdivision, Bridle Path by Richard A. McCullough, Inc. Builders, with the condition that the engineer or environmental consultant supervise the construction of the drainage and that the wetland areas approximate to the homes be permanently marked.  All in favor.

 

c.  Wetlands Application #506, 10-Lot Subdivision in Upland Review Area, Extension of Isabella Drive, KRL Builders

 

The applicant stated that this is an extension to a subdivision approved approximately 2 1/2 years ago and is located off of Turnpike Road.  The application proposes catch basins which will drain into the wetlands.  The area is flat with sand and gravel soils and provides optimum conditions with very little sand discharge into the wetlands.

 

David Askew asked for a detailed map of the storm drainage system.  The applicant said that Sandy Aeschlimann had not yet had time to do one, but will be preparing one soon.  The applicant also stated that there would be no clearing necessary for this project, with the exception of a small area for one home site.  The site used to be a corn field.

 

A motion was made by Lise Wood and seconded by Don Smith to approve Wetlands Application #506, 10-Lot subdivision in upland review area, extension of Isabella Drive by KRL Builders, with the condition that the storm drainage system be approved by David Askew.  All in favor.

 

d.  Other

 

Joan Formeister asked who wrote the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan.  Mr. Askew replied that it was written by an engineering firm selected by the Town.

 

IV.  NEW BUSINESS:

 

a.  Wetlands Application #507, 4-Lot Subdivision in Upland Review Area, 47 Stafford Road, Kane

 

William Palmberg presented plans for a 4-lot subdivision just east of Springfield Road which includes 4 areas of wetland – one large, three small.  Mr. Palmberg stated there would be no disturbance to the wetlands but work would be done within the 100 foot regulated area.

 

David Askew has been working on Lot #1 with the developer and engineers and said that the effect on the wetlands is very small.  He requested that the applicant provide clearing limits on the plan and asked to have flags on the boundaries of the wetland within the field during the next week or so.  In addition, the larger wetland area, which is the most functioning on the site, needs to be permanently marked in areas close to the proposed houses once final approval is received.

 

b.  Wetlands Application #508, Garage and Grading in Upland Review Area, 870 Main Street, Hewitt

 

Mr. Hewitt provided a map showing his home and the proposed driveway and 3-car garage.  The lot is located on Route 190 (Main Street), near Gulf Road.

 

David Askew said that the area has been graded and is currently in violation for not obtaining a permit. The wetland area has been reflagged recently and shows the wetland area to actually be much narrower than marked on a map in 1989.  Essentially, the proposal is for culverting a section of intermittent stream.

 

Todd Whitford asked if the garage would be built over a culvert and what the grade would be where the garage would sit.  Mr. Hewitt replied that it would be 23 feet from the culvert and would be in a flat area.

 

Don Smith asked if it would be better to have more pipe installed and was told by Mr. Askew that it would not because more area would have to be filled.

 

Discussion moved to how Mr. Hewitt had begun certain parts of the preparatory work such as constructing a plunge pool to slow the flow of the water.  Todd Whitford surmised that the groundwork for the project had already begun and stated that if the application was denied Mr. Hewitt would probably have to restore the area.  Both David Askew and Mr. Hewitt replied that indeed some of the groundwork had been done.

 

David Askew added that there would not be a loss of any valuable wetland area as a result of the construction of the garage or driveway turn-around, as the wetland simply conveys water down the slope.

 

Sarah Moynihan asked if the water would still be able to flow along its natural course once the project is complete and Mr. Hewitt said that it would.

 

David Askew suggested the following conditions:  first, that the applicant stabilize the existing cut and driving surface because some erosion has already occurred; second, that additional stone be added to the incised channel; and third, that no floor drain be constructed in the garage.  Mr. Askew also encouraged Commission members to look at the lot prior to the next meeting.  Mr. and Mrs. Hewitt both invited members to stop by at their convenience.

 

V.  AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION:

 

There was no audience participation.

 

VI.  STAFF/COMMISSION REPORT:

 

David Askew presented his report, summarizing it briefly.  He explained that restoration work had been done on the Four Town Fairgrounds without contacting him or the consulting wetland scientist.  He met with their Board of Directors and requested a letter explaining their restoration plans prior to this meeting so that the Commission could review them.  However, none had been received.

 

Included with the report was a copy of Mr. Askew’s memorandum to Patrice Carson, Town Planner, dated June 3, 2004, regarding the erosion at Worthington Pond.  Also included was a copy of a letter he had written to Beverly Richards dated June 29, 2004, regarding her property at 292 Stafford Road and the selective clearing adjacent to Thrasher Brook.  He recommended that Commission members look over these items.

 

Mr. Askew mentioned that he had also submitted a memorandum to the Planning Commission regarding the revised 1-lot subdivision at the end of the cul-de-sac on Eaglebrook Drive.

 

Don Smith asked about the Trappe logging.  Mr. Askew said that it had been completed and he expects to visit and walk the site next week.

 

A motion was made by Lise Wood, seconded by Todd Whitford, and unanimously approved that the Commission accept the report.

 

VI.  CORRESPONDENCE AND BILLS:

 

David Askew presented a bill for $60.00 from CACIWC.  A motion was made by Lise Wood, seconded by Don Smith and unanimously approved to pay the bill.

 

There was no correspondence.

 

VII.  MINUTES APPROVAL –  (June 2, 2004 and June 16, 2004):

 

A motion was made by Lise Wood, seconded by Todd Whitford, and unanimously approved to accept the minutes for the June 2, 2004 meeting as written.

 

A motion was made by Lise Wood, seconded by Dan Fraro, and unanimously approved to accept the June 16, 2004 special meeting minutes as written.

 

VIII.  ADJOURNMENT:

 

A motion was made by Todd Whitford, seconded by Dan Fraro, and unanimously approved by the Commission to adjourn the meeting at 8:55 p.m.

 

                                                                        Respectfully submitted,

 

 

 

                                                                        Lise Wood, Secretary

 

                                                                        Robin Timmons, Recording Secretary