TOWN OF SOMERS

CONSERVATION COMMISSION

P.O. BOX 308

SOMERS, CONNECTICUT 06071

 

CONSERVATION MINUTES

REGULAR MEETING

Wednesday, November 2, 2005

7:00 p.m.

I.  CALL TO ORDER

 

Chairman Joan Formeister called the regular meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Joan Formeister, Dan Fraro, Karl Walton, Lise Wood and Todd Whitford (arrived at 7:10 p.m.) were present and constituted a quorum.  Also present:  Wetlands Agent David Askew.

 

A motion was made by Karl Walton, seconded by Dan Fraro and unanimously approved to take the agenda out of order.

 

II.  OLD BUSINESS 

 

b.  Discussion/Possible Decision:  Wetlands Application #527, Commercial Addition in Upland Review Area, 59 Field Road, Ulitsch

 

The applicant is proposing to add on to his building at 59 Field Road known as Protek Auto Works.  The commercial expansion would consist of slab construction at the rear of the building.  Once completed, the new area would serve as indoor storage for motorcycles.

 

Mr. Askew noted that the wetland, all of which has been flagged, will not be impacted by the construction.  Mr. Askew contacted Connecticut Water Company to inform them of the proposal.

 

A motion was made by Karl Walton, seconded by Lise Wood and unanimously voted to approve the wetlands application.

 

c.  Discussion/Possible Decision:  Wetlands Application #528, 25-lot Subdivision, Battle Street, Leno

 

Ric Leno was not in attendance.  Mr. Askew stated that he has walked the property and additional information is needed.  In order to protect water quality in Gilletes Brook, the detention basin should be designed as a water quality basin to conform to CT Guidelines for Stormwater Quality  Other stormwater discharges should also be treated.  In addition, a few lots that contain wetlands may have insufficient room for typical residential appurtenances.  Mr. Askew also noted that there is one lot which is very close to a vernal pool.  Mr. Askew will send a letter requesting additional information.

 

The item was tabled for further discussion at a future meeting.  There is still time pending on the application.

 

a.  Discussion/Possible Decision:  Wetlands Application #524, Grading in Upland Review Area, Pond Dredging and Filling of Wetland, 164 Hampden Road, Grower Direct

 

Environmental Consultant Mike Mocko summarized his second monthly site report regarding the activities on the site and noted that he will be delivering a written report in the near future.  Work has been continuing to maintain erosion control at the site.  With all the recent flooding, there were no large erosion problems, except for some sedimentation in the pond, and sediment deposition in Thrashers Brook resulting from upstream erosion. 

 

Mr. Mocko presented revised plans for the three terraces to be used as outdoor growing areas.  The terraces,  are currently under construction and stone walkways have been laid between them.  Irrigation systems are being set up.

 

Runoff will be moved through filtration swales and end up in containment basins.  The length of the swale is designed to infiltrate much of the water runoff.  The flow of the water through the system is meant to be kept at a slow velocity in order to prevent damage from the water movement.  Rock rip is proposed so that once the basins fill, they will overflow and water will be dropped 6 feet down through the rip rap to the next berm.  It was noted that the rip-rap will need to be installed prior to channeling the water through the area.

 

Because the pond is still receiving sediment at this time, David Askew asked about the proposed construction time-table.  He was concerned because work in the area appears hap-hazard.  Since the dredging is still 9 months into the future, the situation, particularly with respect to the sediment, needs to be improved substantially prior to that time. 

 

Discussion as to how to make these improvements followed and Mr. Mocko and Mr. VanWingerden agreed to enlarge the existing sediment basin by at least one cell

 

The applicant would like to square up the growing area and have a curtain shade retaining wall along the outside of what has already been built. 

 

Mr. Askew stated that construction work has been occurring over the last 3 or 4 months while the permit process is still pending.  Permits are to be obtained before construction is done so that all plans can be reviewed, which may be helpful to the applicant as well as to the town.  Mrs. Formeister added that permits are  required by law and, even though proposed activities may be approved, it is necessary to comply with the rules and regulations of the Town by going through the permit process. 

 

Mr. Askew also noted that much of the remaining land on the parcel available for expansion, particularly to the south of the existing growing area, is predominantly wetland.  If the wetlands continue to be chipped away in this manner, they will slowly disappear.  Mr. Walton added that the property is quite large and contains land that is not wetland, which could have been used for the construction.

 

Mr. VanWingerden said that he has replaced much of the wetlands and improved the area from the way it was when he purchased it.   He has added to the amount of wetlands on the site so that now there are more than when he purchased the site originally. 

 

Discussion followed as to where the materials from the dredging will be taken.  They will be removed from the site or used as fill in non-wetland areas.

 

Mr. VanWingerden stated that he would also like to extend the shipping and receiving and parking area.  This would require extending the pipes in order to allow for better drainage.  He would also like to shift the road further into the wetlands and construct a rock rip rap slope. 

 

Mr. Askew noted that this would involve more wetland filling and he would need specific information as to the amount of square footage of the wetland area which would be impacted.  The applicant was asked to provide this information prior to the next meeting. 

 

A letter of extension is necessary for the application to continue to the next meeting.   Mike Mocko will take care of this letter and submit it, along with his written monthly activity report.

 

d.  Other    -- No other Old Business was presented.

 

 

III.  NEW BUSINESS

 

a.  Other – No New Business was presented.

 

IV.  AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION     

 

There was none.

 

V.  DISCUSSION:  PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 

 

The next POCD meeting will be held on November 14, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. and the Economic Development Commission has been invited to attend.

 

VI.  STAFF/COMMISSIONER REPORTS

 

Mr. Askew presented his Wetland’s Agent Report and noted that since the storm most of his time has been spent dealing with the resulting damage.  The storm was determined to be a 100-year storm event for much of Tolland County.  Gulf Brook is now at least 3 times wider than it was originally, downstream from the Gulf Road crossing.  There are 4 sites which federal monies might be available for repairing the damage caused by the storm. 

 

A motion was made by Todd Whitford, seconded by Lise Wood and unanimously voted to approve the Wetland Agent’s Report as written.

 

At 8:10 p.m. Chairman Formeister left the meeting and Karl Walton was seated as Chairman for the remainder of the meeting.

 

VII.  CORRESPONDENCE AND BILLS   

 

No correspondence or bills were presented.

 

VIII.  MINUTES APPROVAL – September 7, 2005 and October 12, 2005

 

Approval of the minutes was tabled because not everyone had received copies of them.

 

IX.  ADJOURNMENT

 

A motion was made by Lise Wood, seconded by Todd Whitford and unanimously

approved to adjourn the meeting at 8:25 p.m.

 

                                                                        Respectfully submitted,

 

                                                                       

                                                                        Lise Wood, Secretary

Robin Timmons, Recording Secretary

 

MINUTES ARE NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVAL AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING.