ZONING BOARD OF
APPEALS
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
November 13, 2007
1. Call to Order:
Chairman Torres called the meeting to
order at 7:35 P.M.
11. Members Present: John Torres, Robert Minch, Barbara Flebotte,
Edward Mack Sr., and Jerry Young (seated for Daniel Scully)
Absent: Daniel Scully and alternate B.J. Ferro III
Public Hearing was called to
order by Chairman Torres at 7:36 P.M.
111. Public
Hearing
1.
1.
Michael and Judith Okraska
Legal notice was read: Michael
and Judith Okraska of
Chairman Torres read a letter
from John Parks, the applicant’s Attorney, dated
11/13/07 withdrawing the appeal. (Please
see attached). Due to the withdrawal of
the above mentioned appeal by Michael and Judith Okraska
of
2.
2.
Robert Sanville
Legal notice was read: Robert Sanville of
Attorney Bonnie Kumiega was present and wished to speak to the Commission
on behalf of her client Mr. Sanville. She explained
that it was during the process of reconfiguring the parcel in question that Mr.
Sanville became aware of the non-conforming use
issue. While going through the process,
the Town Sanitation Officer and the Town
Page 1 of 3
She read some of Mr. Jacobs letter to the Board; it stated that he had reviewed the revised
plans of 10/23/07 for the above referenced property and noted that parcel #1
appears to be in compliance with section 19-13-B100AE- subsection E of the
Connecticut Public Health Code, technical standards for subsurface sewage
disposal.
Attorney Kumiega
stated that there is a natural hardship due to the presence of Gillette Brook
which is located on the property. This hardship arises out of circumstances and
conditions beyond and outside the property owner’s control. It is for that reason that the applicant
requests that the variance be granted in order to make it conforming.
The Commission stated that
with the new State Regulations, and how Wetlands are now identified, there
needs to be at least 40,000 (contiguous) square feet of buildable
area for there to be a “legal lot”.
Mr. Sanville
wants a variance for the proposed Parcel/lot #2 because it is
non-conforming. The applicant has no
issue selling the property as it is current exists, due to it being “grandfathered
in”. The issue/hardship arises once the
applicant wishes to subdivide the lot; adding that the hardship is being
created by subdividing the property. If
the current home was to be damaged the current owner of the property could
rebuild if need be because there would still be 2 - 2 ½ acres in which to build
that are not flagged as wetlands. If the
property in question is subdivided, this does not stand as true.
Attorney Bonnie Kumiega requested that this case be continued to the ZBA’s next meeting of 12/11/07 in order to gather more
information. The request was granted by
the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Abutters Mildred Barend, Carolyn and Francis Cook were present.
After all discussion,
motion made by Commissioner Minch; seconded by Commissioner Flebotte
and unanimously approved to cease discussion and adjourn the public hearing.
Public Hearing closed at 8:10
P.M
IV. Regular Meeting
The regular meeting continued
at 8:11 P.M.
V. Minutes
Approval – September 11, 2007
Motion made by
Commissioner Minch, seconded by Commissioner Flebotte,
to approve the ZBA September 11, 2007 minutes as presented. Motion approved unanimously.
VI. Public Hearing Discussion
No
Public Discussion
VII. Old Business:
No Old Business
Page 2 of 3
VIII. New Business:
No New Business
IX. Correspondence:
No Correspondence
X. Bills:
Motion made by
Commissioner Minch; seconded by Commissioner Young to pay all ZBA bills
including the Journal Inquirer in the amount of $330.84. Motion approved unanimously.
XI. Adjournment:
Motion made by
Commissioner Flebotte; second by Commissioner Mack
Sr. to adjourn the meeting. Motion
approved unanimously.
The meeting stood
adjourned at 8:25 P.M.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jennifer D. Boudreau
Recording Secretary